Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 15:42
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Which current F1 drivers should switch teams based on historical patterns?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Important scientific finding confirms ancient biblical events - The Brighter Side of News
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Meta found 'covertly tracking' Android users through Instagram and Facebook - Sky News
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Thank you.
Scientists May Have Discovered a Surprising Health Benefit of Mango - EatingWell
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Uber Is Making A Push In Data Labeling After Scale AI’s Deal With Meta - Forbes
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Global Investors Suddenly Have a New Concern: A U.S. ‘Revenge Tax’ - WSJ